John Of Tours

John of Tours or John de Villula (died 1122) was a medieval Bishop of Wells in England who moved the diocese seat to Bath. He was a native of Tours and was King William I of England's doctor before becoming a bishop. After his consecration as bishop, he was either given or purchased Bath Abbey, a rich monastery, and then moved the headquarters of the diocese from Wells, to the abbey. He rebuilt the church at Bath, building a large cathedral that no longer survives. He gave a large library to his cathedral and received the right to hold a fair in Bath. Not noted for his scholarship, he died suddenly in 1122.

Early life

A native of Tours,Cantor ''Church, Kingship, and Lay Investiture'' p. 36 John was an Angevin-French physicianSmith "John of Tours" ''Downside Review'' pp. 132–133 to King William I of England, being present at the king's deathbed in 1087.Barlow ''William Rufus'' p. 45 William of Malmesbury, the medieval chronicler, called him "a very skilled doctor, not in theoretical knowledge, but in practice."Quoted in Bartlett ''England Under the Norman and Angevin Kings'' p. 589 He had been a priest of Tours before becoming doctor to King William.Ramsey "Tours, John of" ''Oxford Dictionary of National Biography'' He seems to have learned his medical skills not in a school, but was considered a skilled doctor. The name "de Villula" first appears in 1691, and is not a contemporary name. It resulted from a misreading of John's name in his episcopal profession.

Bishop of Bath

John was appointed Bishop of Wells in 1088 by King William II "Rufus", the son and successor to William I. The bishop's consecration was in July,Fryde, et al. ''Handbook of British Chronology'' p. 227 at Canterbury by Archbishop Lanfranc, the Archbishop of Canterbury. He probably owed his appointment to the king's desire to honour his father's physician.

Shortly after his consecration, John bought Bath Abbey's grounds from the king,Barlow ''William Rufus'' p. 182 as well as the city of Bath itself. Whether John paid Rufus for the town or whether he was given the town as a gift by the king is unclear. The abbey had recently lost its abbot Alfsige, and was according to Domesday Book the owner of large estates in and near the town. It would have been the wealth of the abbey that attracted John to take over the monastery.Smith "John of Tours" ''Downside Review'' pp. 134–135 By acquiring the town of Bath, John also acquired the mint that was in the town.Mason ''William II'' p. 130 In 1090 he transferred the seat, or administration, of the bishopric to Bath Abbey,Huscroft ''Ruling England'' p. 128 probably as an attempt to increase the revenues of his see. Bath was a rich abbey, and Wells had always been a poor diocese. By taking over the abbey, John increased his episcopal revenues.Williams ''English and the Norman Conquest'' p. 136 William of Malmesbury portrays the moving of the episcopal seat as motivated by a desire for the lands of the abbey, but it was part of a pattern at the time of moving cathedral seats from small villages to larger towns. When John moved his episcopal seat, he also took over the abbey of Bath as his cathedral chapter, turning his diocese into a bishopric served by monks instead of the canons located at Wells that had previously served the diocese.Knowles ''Monastic Order'' p. 132

John rebuilt the monastic church at Bath, which had been damaged during one of Robert de Mowbray's rebellions. As rebuilt, it was only surpassed in size by the cathedrals at Ely, Norwich and Winchester. The present Bath Cathedral is not the building that John built, and occupies only a fraction of the space that John's building encompassed.Smith "John of Tours" ''Downside Review'' pp. 136–137 He also reformed the administration of his diocese, setting up archdeacons and organising a court for hearing ecclesiastical cases.Smith "John of Tours" ''Downside Review'' pp. 138–139 His efforts to reform his diocese led to his cathedral chapter's complaining of their treatment, which John seems to have ignored.Brett ''English Church'' p. 8 At Wells, he was accused of destroying the community of canons there, which had been created by his predecessor.

In 1092, he helped with the consecration of Old Sarum Cathedral, although its roof was almost immediately damaged by a storm and required decades of repair. In 1094, he performed the same service for Battle Abbey.Smith "John of Tours" ''Downside Review'' pp. 140–141 After the accession of King Henry I of England, John received a confirmation of the grant of the city of Bath, paying 500 pounds of silver for the verification.Page ''History of the County of Somerset: Volume 2: Houses of Benedictine Monks: The Cathedral Priory of Bath'' In 1102, John secured from King Henry the right to hold fairs at Bath on the feast day of the cathedral's patron saint, Saint Peter. He gave an extensive library to the cathedral at Bath, and eventually the monks there became reconciled to him. John, however, continued to hold most of the old abbey's manors himself, rather than using them for the support of the monks.

Investiture Controversy

John was one of the bishops that sided with King William against Anselm of Canterbury at the king's Whitsun council in 1097,Vaughn ''Anselm of Bec and Rober of Meulan'' p. 201 one of early councils called during the Investiture Controversy in England. During the reign of King Henry I, who succeeded his brother King William in 1100, John along with Robert Bloet, the Bishop of Lincoln, consecrated abbots who had been invested in office by the king.Vaughn ''Anselm of Bec and Robert of Meulan'' pp. 248–249 John attended Anselm's reforming Council of London in 1102, which debated and passed decrees to reform the clergy.

Death and legacy

John died in December 1122 and was buried in Bath Cathedral.Greenway "Bishops" ''Fasti Ecclesiae Anglicanae 1066–1300'': Volume 7: Bath and Wells He suffered a heart attack after dinner and died suddenly.Barlow ''English Church'' p. 263 Traditionally the date of his death is given as 29 December.

Under John, the monks of Bath became known for their scholarship, although he was not particularly noted for learning. William of Malmesbury claimed he was generous and affable, although the chronicler acknowledged that the bishop treated the canons of Wells abominably. William also recorded that John was a heavy drinker and not given to self-restraint, but that his health was good and he lived to be old.Barlow ''English Church'' pp. 66–67 At first he treated the monks at Bath with contempt and confiscated much of the lands of the abbey for his own use, but in 1106 he restored their lands to them. John's canons of Wells disliked him because he reduced their income and destroyed some of their buildings as part of the movement of the see to Bath. A layman official of the diocese, Hildebert, was probably John's brother; and he held the offices of steward of the diocese and was also the provost of Wells, an inheritable office.Brett ''English Church'' p. 178 John gave much of the revenues of Wells to Hildebert. Another relative, a nephew also named John, was named archdeacon in the diocese.Greenway "Archdeacons without Territorial Title" ''Fasti Ecclesiae Anglicanae 1066-1300'': Volume 7: Bath and Wells

Citations

References

*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*

{{DEFAULTSORT:John of Tours
1122 deaths
Bishops of Bath
Bishops of Wells
11th-century English Roman Catholic bishops
Year of birth unknown
12th-century English Roman Catholic bishops